A new TV streaming service, Discovery+, has released a docudrama series on US prison escape artist RICHARD LEE MCNAIR.
As Author of the book on McNair [The Man Who Mailed Himself Out of Jail] — plus the ‘gatekeeper’ for much of his intel — I was an obvious choice to ‘showcase’ the four-part series.
Program credits list more than a dozen people, including a few Executive Producers. I was one.
Because of an unusually high number of geographical gaffs and poor editorial control, this executive producer is giving the series 1.5 stars out of 5.
WHO IS RICHARD MCNAIR?
In April 2006, Richard Lee McNair, a one-time killer and many-time thief, pulled off a Houdini-like escape from a state-of-the-art prison in Pollock, Louisiana. It was the first time someone had bolted from a federal joint in decades.
The dramatic escape grabbed the attention of people worldwide — for two reasons: Hidden in a pallet of old mailbags, the Oklahoma native, serving time for murder, shipped himself to freedom. And just hours later, he smooth-talked his way out of an encounter with a policeman.
It was Richard McNair’s third escape from custody. That’s right. His third.
And so began McNair’s wild, 18-month journey across the US and Canada. In late October 2017, one of America’s Most Wanted was tackled by a rookie RCMP officer in a forest near my hometown of Campbellton, New Brunswick, Canada.
While on the run, McNair committed numerous break-ins — mainly at car dealerships where he helped himself to new wheels and petty cash.
According to law enforcement on both sides of the border, the fugitive did not physically hurt anyone while on the lam. There were no armed robberies, muggings or grabbing cash from people at ATMs. That’s an important point because that’s not how most escapees behave.
After McNair was collared by the Mounties, he was sent packing to what is described as the world’s most secure penitentiary in Florence, Colorado — ADX, the Supermax. The ‘Alcatraz of the Rockies’ is home to some nasty characters: the Unabomber, Doctor Death, the Shoe Bomber, turncoat FBI spies and, now, kidnapped drug lord El Chapo.
I began to write to Richard McNair in late 2008, about a year after he stepped off a prison bus at ADX. I was soon getting many letters from the prisoner, revealing stuff that no one — especially law enforcement and crime reporters — knew a thing about. That led to me travelling across the US and Canada [just as the fugitive did] as I researched a book on the con’s three escapes plus his time on the lam.
From McNair’s letters, I also became privy to details of the 1987 killing that put him behind bars, an inside look at how he pulled off his escapes, his childhood in Oklahoma and his time in the US Air Force plus, of course, how and where he spent his time on the lam. All interesting stuff. Gold.
It took more than a year to conduct dozens of interviews, collect documents and family photos, plus fact-check both the fugitive’s and law enforcement’s versions of events.
When the dust settled, I had more than 350 hand-written letters from the world’s greatest prison escape artist. The stuff was beyond fascinating … and when the book came out, it included a truckload of proprietary [copyrighted] information. The revelations first led to an ‘ebook,’ then an updated paperback. If you’re wondering which one to buy [provided you’re into true crime], go with the paperback. More info.
Both books are available on Amazon. I haven’t included any hyperlinks because the links vary depending on the country one is ordering from.
BEHIND THE CURTAIN …
Tracing Richard McNair’s journey was a journey in itself. There were dozens of interviews that led to two reporting awards — including a national citation for the top newspaper series in Canada.
I was also featured on History in a two-hour special on prison breakouts. And now, a TV series called The Prison Breaker on Discovery+.
Because of McNair’s spectacular escape from a pen in Louisiana, the con has been featured in some TV documentaries about prison breakouts. Richard Lee McNair is to prison escape artists what Babe Ruth was to baseball and Wayne Gretzky to hockey.
The Discovery series is being shown in the US, Canada and in a number of countries around the world. My recommendation? Avoid it.
[Image courtesy of GOtv, Kenya]
For my on-camera contribution, I was interviewed in the fall of 2020 at a beautiful chalet overlooking Fiddle Lake in the Laurentian Mountains, 45 minutes drive north of Montreal, Quebec. The shooting took place over three days.
The rustic setting gave the impression that I live in a log cabin in the Canadian wilderness. I’m not making that up. Perhaps that’s how Americans see Canadians, I don’t know. For the record, I live in a regular house in a quiet subdivision in the west end of Edmonton, Alberta. And my pet isn’t moose or a beaver; it’s an American Yorkshire terrier.
I arrived for the interview — not carrying a hockey stick or wearing a toque — but sporting an Aussie Akubra hat. I also had a copy of the paperback on McNair, his letters, coins and fake driving licences.
It’s been quite a journey for the Author because of the many twists and turns — plus bumps, red flags and wake-up calls. I dealt with some well-meaning people, shady media outlets, unscrupulous American lawyers … and producers short on talent and originality but big on industry buzz terms. Wannabes.
The smoke-and-mirrors was often way over the top. From producers, the BS ranged from, “Who do you want to play your part in a movie?” … to “I got your back!” When media people tell you they have your back, check to see if they’re holding a jar of vaseline.
Sleaze, of course, is not a crime. But unfortunately, to some, sleaze is as natural as breathing. I saw far more integrity in killer Richard McNair than most media people I dealt with. Read that again.
However, I learned some valuable lessons … and for that, I am grateful.
WHY A THUMBS DOWN?
The four-part series featured some precious archival footage and excellent videography. Hats off to those who made that happen.
But in my view, the series failed for three reasons: 1] it was disjointed … 2] contaminated with fake talking heads … and 3] not accurate owing to poor editorial control.
It was a superficial high school production that followed a predictable, cookie-cutter format. In other words, not a lot of original thinking. And that was ironic because the ‘sizzle reel’ the TV production company distributed to help sell the series was A-1.
I realize the need for things to be exciting and entertaining; I get that. But it should also be accurate.
What is Richard Lee McNair known for? And why does the Wikipedia write-up on him sometimes have more views than its write-up on Elvis Presley? Was it a fatal shooting in Minot in the 1980s? No. How about the time the con slipped out of handcuffs? Not likely. How about the prisoner removing a cinder block from his jail cell? Nope. That’s all exciting stuff, but nothing that would warrant someone getting a highly-viewed page in Wikipedia.
Richard McNair is known for shipping himself out of prison.
The series could have started this way: a man trapped in a dark, cramped space … struggling to breathe … etc. Ya gotta grab viewers’ attention in the very first episode. This production doesn’t.
Let’s get into the geographical boo-boos of The Prison Breaker. You might want to pour yourself a stiff drink because these are stunning …
The beautiful scene below is not as advertised. This isn’t Penticton, British Columbia, Canada, where Richard McNair was nearly captured by the RCMP in 2006. The setting is Campbellton, New Brunswick — 3,100 miles away.
The TV production company did not label its resource material properly. And it sure looks like the fact-checkers at Discovery were also asleep at the wheel because they were told about the errors. Could it be the network did not care if its product was inaccurate?
According to The Prison Breaker, the highway shown in the image below is in West Virginia, USA. False. This is actually Highway 11 in New Brunswick. Locals will recognize Sugarloaf Mountain on the left. The road sign indicates Atholville and Campbellton … but there’s no Atholville or Campbellton in West Virginia.
[Click on all images to enlarge slightly.]
Two other scenes were also mistakenly identified as Penticton, BC. There’s no need to post them; you get the point by now.
Are these gaffs critical? Most media people would say they sure are, not to mention being unprofessional and embarrassing. And perhaps some viewers, especially non-Canadians, couldn’t give less. Well, I care.
I brought the errors to the attention of Discovery, hoping these mistakes would be corrected. Maybe they were. Perhaps they weren’t. The last three emails to Debbie Sullivan, head of Communications at Discovery, whom I questioned on errors, have gone unanswered. Now, that’s ‘communication by silence.’
I also asked Sullivan if Discovery would review the raw interview tapes to see if the interviewees were told what to say. Not a terribly difficult thing to do; just check out the raw videos. Plus Discovery’s position on plagiarism. Haven’t heard back. The silence says all one needs to know.
Episode One focuses on McNair’s attempted breakout from Ward County Jail in Minot, North Dakota in early 1988. In one scene, McNair writes: “I concentrated on my military training and thought about how difficult our military fighters had it in Afghanistan …” Great quote and given the pickle he was in, it seemed appropriate. However … in 1988, the US did not have troops in Afghanistan.
Those are McNair’s words, all right — but McNair is describing a breakout 18 years later.
The production company was aware of the gaffe, but chose not to correct it. That’s code for: no one is going to notice.
Another gaff: When McNair ‘mailed himself out of jail,’ he was encased in a shrink-wrapped pallet of mailbags destined for a warehouse just beyond the prison fence in Pollock, Louisiana. In the Discovery+ docudrama, the prisoner is shown breathing through a tiny plastic tube attached to the top portion of a two-litre plastic pop bottle. That never happened. Prisoners at USP Pollock do not have access to those large plastic bottles.
Showing McNair breathing through a tiny plastic tube is pure Hollywood. The prisoner could get air because of a larger tube [made from pressed cardboard]. Mr. Escapee had poked the tube through an opening in the bottom of the pallet. McNair would not have made it had he been trying to breathe through a tiny plastic tube. It’s unfortunate producers didn’t consult with the Author before shooting started because it’s all there in the book …
Mind you, according to the owner of the TV production company, she and the Author were to have “final say.” Maybe she had the final say, but I sure didn’t.
Some corrections were made to the initial drafts. But overall, still a poor production.
At one point, producers had prisoner McNair laughing when his letters showed he was not displaying that characteristic. How could something like that work its way into a script? It’s my guess the cynical laughter was deliberately added, then ‘overlooked’ by agenda-driven producers who wanted the con to appear more sinister. Better for ratings.
And if the network relies on information from law enforcement for its productions — as in their ‘bread and butter’ — it helps their survival.
The most distressing part of the series was the continued use of so-called talking heads … particularly a former CNN reporter and a former journalist with the Calgary Herald [who now works public relations for the City of Calgary]. Both interviewees had intimate details of McNair’s escapes which — for some reason — were never included in their stories on McNair. Why’s that?
Here’s a clue: their contribution just happens to match information from the book on McNair. Some would say that’s plagiarism, even if the production company had a contractual right to the Author’s material. Whatever. It’s certainly nothing to be proud of.
There’s a difference between a knowledgeable expert and a talking head.
Was this a case of “Say this, say that … now you’re an expert?” I suspect it was. The answer, of course, lies in the raw interview videos. It’s my guess the director who interviewed the talking heads did not say, “Wow! Where did you get all this exclusive information … because it sure wasn’t included in your own reports.”
Instead of the former CNN lady holding a pad of notes, it would’ve been more transparent had she been reading straight out of the book.
When viewing the series, take note of the facial expressions of the talking heads, especially after they finish speaking. They’re looking for approval, as in, “Did I get that right?” You won’t see approval looks on those truly connected to the McNair story — police officers, McNair’s former girlfriend, McNair’s father, the North Dakota reporter who first covered the crime, the Author, etc.
Note to talking heads: Stick to material you have first-hand knowledge of. And don’t play up for the camera … this isn’t a tryout for the Jerry Springer Show.
The Calgary ‘crime blogger’ has posted more than 100 crime-related stories … but just one on Richard Lee McNair. And that was posted 15 years ago. Her McNair story is based on an erroneous Calgary Police news release that the US fugitive ‘could’ be hiding out in the Alberta city. In fact, McNair was thousands of miles away.
A producer later conceded that choosing this individual was a ‘mistake.’ Fine. No one’s perfect, although I wonder about the screening process. In any case, thank you for the honesty. But what corrective action was taken? None. The individual remained an integral part of the series.
I asked that Discovery view these raw videos so it could determine if those being interviewed were told what to say. As owner of the series, I’m sure Discovery would want to know that.
It would have been useful if the TV production company had talked to these former reporters about what it was like to follow false police tips, because it happened a lot with the McNair saga. This was no fault of police, nor the reporters … it just illustrates how false sightings helped the fugitive stay on the run.
Richard McNair was, of course, delighted when the news media reported he was in a certain area when he was actually three time zones away. This is why he faithfully watched America’s Most Wanted.
The ex-CNN reporter was described by the owner of the production company as a long-time friend. That could explain why she went from being ‘Susie’ on the production notes to ‘Susan’ on the screen credits.
What I came across on the Internet on the reporter blew me away. I’ll let you make that discovery yourself. Watch the series, get her full name … then Google it.
The shrink had some great one-liners. The trouble is, they were so generic, that they could apply to anyone. The good news is that if the TV production company gets to do another true-crime doc, they can still use the doctor’s quotes because his insight applies to most prisoners.
The shrink based his opinion on Richard Lee McNair — not by going through the prisoner’s files, nor by meeting with him, even talking to him on the phone — but from reading some of his letters. So this is the basis of his prognosis? Hmmm. I can’t see that being credible. [Full disclosure: I could not access McNair’s medical files and when I was handed his dental file in British Columbia, I was not permitted to view it.]
Again, if one were to view all the raw interview tapes from the talking heads, they would see how much these people actually knew … and if they were told what to say. Were they coached? I’m not talking about directors asking to cut back a 3-minute clip to 15 seconds; that’s a different matter. Being told what to say so your comments fit a set narrative is not journalism.
PROMISES, PROMISES …
I’m stating the obvious here, but promises that are honoured instill confidence and contribute to a trusting work environment. Broken promises, just the opposite.
When the TV production company owner assured me that she and I had final say, that’s HUGE. I would not have agreed to hand over all my material on McNair without that kind of assurance.
According to a key producer of the series, Seth Porges, the owner talked to him about this. So the pledge wasn’t a big secret. It was just a dirty secret. I brought up the promise in numerous emails — to half a dozen production staff — but no one seemed to think much of it. No one phoned for clarification or fired off an email or a text. Why not? They knew the promise was nothing more than a ploy to get someone to sign over their material.
Another producer assured me that if I had any questions, I would phone her right away! I did have questions, and so I called … several times. Silence. If you can’t keep your promises, don’t make ’em.
Then there’s a pledge by Porges [whose company played a significant part in the production] that he wouldn’t back the series if I didn’t give it a thumbs up. That promise lasted about a day or so, then he reneged. I mentioned that to the Discovery exec, and she SCREAMED, “He said that???” Ahem, yes, he certainly did.
You were had, lady … although your silence indicates you’re not too bothered about it.
SHOULD YOU WATCH THE SERIES?
Yes, by all means. And I hope you find it “entertaining.”
Just don’t get tricked into thinking it’s accurate. You might not pick up on the gaffs, or you might. That’s not the point. You’ve now read this blog piece, and you know more about how the series on Richard Lee McNair came about.
I categorize the production as a ‘docudrama’ instead of a documentary, and for a good reason.
REACTION FROM DISCOVERY
Since the fall of 2021, I have been in touch with an executive at Discovery. We’ve talked on the phone a few times and exchanged emails. Debbie Sullivan is well aware of my concerns.
Here’s the news release from Discovery on The Prison Breaker series. In a separate news release, a Discovery Communications person was named as a contact, along with her email and phone number. Turns out, the phone number was bogus. How weird was that? In my 35-plus years of handling news releases, can’t say I ever came across a wrong phone number.
I will leave with this: Given my experience with the McNair project, I will forever view TV documentaries with scepticism. I’ll always wonder what was omitted, why people were chosen for interviews … and I will seriously doubt if what I’m seeing on TV is accurate.
STEVE BUJOLD’S PODCAST
Click here to hear Steve Bujold’s interview with former US Air Force Police Officer Sam Bell Jr. and myself on the McNair series. It runs for just under an hour.
Take note of the host’s comments at the very end.
ON A LIGHTER NOTE …
A reader in Eastern Canada — who has better skills with Adobe Photoshop than I — sent this image of my ‘cabin’ …
I’m going to watch the documentary series and compare it to the book.
Too bad they had to mess up on a lot of info. I have an android box, so I should be able to find the channel. I’ll send you my feedback once viewed.
It makes one wonder what is real and what is not.
It’s disappointing for you, especially after all that work, and your experience with this stuff.
Hope I get to see the series, do you have to be a member, pay a membership like Netflix or will it be available for all?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hard to believe that they can’t even be truthful with documentary programs!
It’s good to see that we’ve all had our eyes opened on that issue, with your breakdown help on this one; I will be keeping an open eye on any documentary in the future!
It sure makes a person wonder, what’s wrong with a truthful story in the 1st place?
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you for taking the time to write.
LikeLiked by 1 person
First, I read “The Man Who Mailed Himself out of Jail,” then watched the documentary, “The Prison Breaker”.
I wondered what prisoner McNair, who had taken the time to precisely document his moves and emotions after he had been incarcerated, was really like. Other than the descriptions of his escapes, he comes across in the TV series as a bright man with innovative ideas on how to survive incarceration.
Why would someone who had committed a murder try to understand why he had gone through this horrendous experience by writing about it? And then to send this to a reporter, withholding nothing, not even his deepest regrets. The book is the story of a man searching his conscience while trying to make sense of a senseless crime he committed.
The documentary never captured the essence of the relationship between the author and the incarcerated man, who essentially was given an opportunity to write his story.
The producers missed the point. They were interested in how McNair escaped and was re-captured. “As long as he is on the loose, this man is dangerous.” Although that was a quote from “The Prison Breaker”, McNair never physically hurt another human being while on the run. Why was this not emphasized?
I could make more comments on inconsistencies between the book and the documentary, but I have another angle from which to look at this story. I understand this documentary series was to depict Richard Lee McNair as the criminal. It is a crime series. But, whoever was initially interested in the book missed the point. They did not explore McNair’s developing and actually, profound relationship with the author of “The Man Who Mailed Himself Out of Jail.” That’s the real human story.
If I was to produce a documentary, I would reflect on the bond between two men who learned to trust each other enough to maintain a correspondence over 10+ years. More importantly, I would focus on the prisoner reflecting on his experience. After all … he did provide most of the story in, “The Man Who Mailed Himself Out of Jail.”
Without McNair’s letters, there would be nothing but overt reporting on his escapes. Dull, without soul. As he says, he committed the murder, served his time and now wants to try to live his life again.
We don’t always know what propels us to perform certain acts. Punish the criminal, but have mercy once the criminal repents.
Katherine, thank you for your insightful comments. I don’t wish to overly knock the editorial people but we’re talking substandard talent. They just don’t have it, and never will.
The series fails to take viewers on a wild ride. Boring. The sad thing is that it could have been so much better, given the material they were handed.
As I viewed the drafts, one thought kept hitting my brain: Given the number of unemployed, skillful people in the entertainment business, is this the best they can do???
I would not recommend this TV production company.
Strange for an executive producer to say, but I hope the series is a bust. I lost a lot of respect for the TV production company, and if it hits hard times and fails, that’s Karma. People hiring friends, and that’s not to mention the smoke-and-mirrors, the deception, usery and lack of journalistic integrity. It was amateur hour on so many levels.
It is my wish that no reporter or writer gets to deal with a nightmare like that.
Pingback: Where Is Richard Lee McNair Today? All About The Prison Breaker Before The Documentary
Pingback: Where Is Richard Lee McNair Today? All About The Prison Breaker Before The Documentary – PinoyTv